Here's an excerpt from an article that recently appeared in the Wall Street Journal:
Much has been said, in an effort to excuse the toxic content of Pastor Wright's sermons, about the ways in which his speeches are part of the "black tradition." But most black churches are Baptist, Methodist or independent. They have religious doctrines with a long history. Trinity, on the other hand, belongs to the United Church of Christ, a mostly white denomination defined almost entirely by its social-justice agenda.
This is how the Rev. John H. Thomas, the UCC's (white) general minister and president, recently defended Pastor Wright: "Many of us would prefer to avoid the stark and startling language Pastor Wright used in these clips. But what was his real crime? He is condemned for using a mild 'obscenity' in reference to the United States. This week we mark the fifth anniversary of the war in Iraq, a war conceived in deception and prosecuted in foolish arrogance. Nearly 4,000 cherished Americans have been killed, countless more wounded, and tens of thousands of Iraqis slaughtered. Where is the real obscenity here?" It's easy to see Mr. Obama's attraction to the UCC, and it doesn't have much to do with faith.
This little nugget can be found discussed both at UCCTruths and Street Prophets, with highly different reactions...ahem.
Anyway, didn't the WSJ used to be a highly respected, high-quality newspaper? This opinion is from one of their "Taste" writers. Aside from that, the entire article smacks of giddiness over finally being able to talk about how Obama is black. That is made no clearer than in the quote above.
Let's start with Obama and Trinity being part of a mostly white denomination. Here's where those who strongly tout the UCC's freedom and autonomy for individual churches can point out that we have black, Asian, Latino, American Indian, and Filipino churches with no problem at all thanks to our polity (not that most denominations' polity is any factor in racial makeup of local churches).
Who gives a rip about what denomination Trinity is? So "truly black" churches can only be Methodist, Baptist, or Independent? In the UCC, a local church's culture is determined at the local level. Actually, that's a pretty universal thing. Not all Methodist, Baptist, and Independent churches are black, either. Far from it. It's absurd that this needs to be pointed out at all. All this particular point does is pigeonhole denominations by race.
Which leads me to my next point: her suggestion that Trinity is "less black" because "the UCC" is predominantly white...that's just stupid. Again, predominant local church culture is the rule. Go tell the members of Trinity that they're less black. I dare you.
You could also read up on the American Missionary Association, a proud part of the UCC's history.
Finally, Obama's attraction to "the UCC" started long ago, before either Iraq war, as Pastor Dan points out at Street Prophets. Rev. Wright, to borrow a phrase, led Obama to Christ. It has everything to do with faith. She just assumes that her readers will follow her train of thought between Rev. Thomas' statement and her non-sequitor about "nothing to do with faith." Her readers apparently are to just assume that Obama joined because he agrees with "the UCC" politically.
The author mentions that Obama first wandered into Trinity to help make connections for the inner city work that he was doing. People often wander into churches for reasons unrelated to faith and end up making commitments to follow Jesus. I thought that'd be something to be celebrated.
Okay, so having shot a few barrel fish, I really will try to put something up about the more serious concerns and issues out there.